| Standards for Standards | |
|
December, 2008 On a personal note, I am back working in a hospital in Manhattan, doing equipment planning for new construction projects - not very enlightening, but it pays the bills. I have calmed down considerably in the past few years, and so at least for the present, will likely not add much here. Write to say hello - it's always nice to hear from someone doing interesting work and/or experiencing bumps in the road. Regards to all. |
|
|
January, 2007 The suggestions stated here are based on an AAMI journal article (PDF file), Volume 40, Issue 4 (July-August 2006). It makes a case for a uniform standards presentation, including the relationships of standards to CE functions. |
|
|
We believe that a system of non-standard compliance data sampling, and a complementary non-standard methodology for displaying policy and standards development, results in limited oversight effectiveness, and a limited understanding of the oversight methodology. If clinical engineering service providers are to be held to strict adherence for compliance accountability, then those participating in policy development should utilize a transparent reference format in developing those policies. This proposed format would standardize the presentation of clinical engineering functions and policies for regulatory and professional organizations, and in-house and third party clinical engineering service providers. |
|
|
Objectives.
1. Create a display format to summarize
Environment of Care and equipment management standards that are current as
well as those in development. The display format will show: 2. Develop a strategy to standardize the collection and presentation of medical equipment inventory and maintenance compliance data that is used for monitoring and quality assessment purposes of healthcare organizations. |
|
|
Goals are to enable the following: 1) a more transparent view of standards development and review procedures; 2) increased understanding of clinical engineering functions and their interrelationships; 3) improved monitoring of the operational status of clinical engineering service providers, (e.g. maintenance compliance, inventory and service records); 4) a more regular and orderly review of operational procedures and policies by regulatory agencies; 5) more accessible information within the network of hospitals and oversight organizations; 6) increased relevancy of operational procedures to policies, and increased participation in policy and standards development by clinical engineering service providers. |
|
|
© 2006 - 2007 |
|